2026 Outlook — Cloudy, With a Chance for… Hope?
- Ross Bogen
- 1 day ago
- 3 min read
Part 2 of the 2026 Outlook Series
By Ross Bogen
A Cautious Optimism
The rays of hope we saw as 2025 came to a close are real — but they are shining through ominous clouds.
Hope is not the same as confidence.
While we should take heart in trends that are clearly positive, we must also recognize — and confront — the serious challenges that remain.
A Warning Against Complacency
On January 5, 2026, Robert Reich warned against what he described as a “kind of complacency” among friends encouraged by recent setbacks faced by Donald Trump.
“All of that is true, but the worst is not over.”
Reich predicts that 2026 may be worse than 2025, precisely because Trump and his supporters understand that the midterm elections could sharply limit what they are able to do. This year, therefore, becomes their window to cash in and aggressively push their agenda.
Before things get better — which will not happen without continued effort and pressure — they may well get worse.
Keep that in mind.
The Democratic Party’s Deeper Problem
The most serious challenge ahead may not be Trump alone, but the current condition of the Democratic Party itself — weakened in ways that go beyond simply lacking power.
In a recent New York Times column titled “Why Does Trump Get Away With It?”, columnist Thomas Edsall outlines several structural reasons Democrats have struggled to effectively oppose Trump’s behavior.
These factors exist in addition to:
A highly accommodating Supreme Court
A largely submissive Republican Party
Trump’s own shamelessness
Widespread capitulation across much of civil society
Two Trends That Cripple Opposition
Edsall and a group of political scientists identify two major trends that have weakened Democratic resistance.
1. Nationalized Polarization
This form of polarization has:
Disabled media accountability
Prevented Democrats from delivering effective counter-narratives
Enabled Trump’s takeover of the Republican Party
Educational polarization, in particular, has fueled suspicion among middle- and working-class voters that Democrats represent self-interested “cognitive elites.”
2. Loss of Credibility Through Cultural Orthodoxy
Edsall’s correspondent Sean Westwood of Dartmouth College argues Democrats have fallen into a rhetorical rut, making:
“Arguments incomprehensible to the electorate at large… speaking a dialect of procedural virtue that doesn’t resonate with the public.”
His core critique is sharp:
“Democrats are trying to prosecute Trump for malice when they should be prosecuting him for malpractice.”
Trump loses support not because voters find his actions unconstitutional, Westwood argues, but because they directly harm people’s lives — through inflation, labor shortages, and economic instability.
A Fair Critique — With Caveats
Westwood’s rhetoric may be overstated and increasingly dated, but the underlying point is difficult to dismiss.
Recent Democratic election victories have often come from campaigns focused on practical consequences, not abstract warnings about authoritarianism.
There remains a temptation to attack Trump’s actions — from military misadventures in the Caribbean to foreign entanglements — as illegal or immoral, rather than wasteful, fraudulent, incompetent, and deeply damaging to U.S. interests.
That distinction matters.
Trump as a “Transformative” President
Edsall highlights a deeper historical concern by comparing Trump to past “transformative presidents” — leaders who dismantled existing political orders.
Citing Erik Schickler of University of California, Berkeley, Edsall notes that Trump stands apart in the extent of destruction he has wrought.
Political scientist Stephen Skowronek of Yale University reluctantly agrees, describing Trump’s presidency as:
“An instrument of negation… a battering ram breaking down the old establishment.”
Unlike past presidents who cleared space to build something new, Trump has shown no interest in reconstruction — only repudiation.
A Cornered Animal
Edsall closes with a dark irony, which brings us back to Robert Reich.
Trump’s recent setbacks, Reich warns, may make him more dangerous, not less — “like a cornered animal.”
But Reich does not end in despair. He issues a call to action:
“It’s more important than ever to be vigilant, protect democracy and the rule of law, and fight back against authoritarianism.”
Ten Things You Can Do in 2026
Reich urges readers to review his full essay — “10 Crucial Things You Can Do in 2026” — and offers the following priorities:
Protect vulnerable immigrant communities
Protect LGBTQ+ members of your community
Demand resistance from your House and Senate representatives
Help Democrats and Independents take back Congress in November
Frame America’s 250th anniversary around constitutional duty, not loyalty to Trump
Support progressive initiatives locally and statewide
Demonstrate against authoritarianism
Participate in strategic boycotts
Support litigation efforts opposing Trump
Spread the truth
If you do nothing else in 2026, do this.
Closing
Let’s be inspired by hope — and get to work.
Author
Ross Bogen
Club Member, Democratic Club of Greater Tracy



Comments